Visit the TCOE discussion board

July 26, 2007

Bangers and mash by at 11:01 AM on July 26, 2007.

From The Peak Oil Crisis: Hard Truths:

The most interesting thing that can be said about the NPC report is that it has very little to do with providing government officials and the rest of us insight into the likely availability of oil over the next 25 years. There are federal employees, international organizations and contractors loaded with expertise that the Secretary of Energy can whistle up in minutes and can produce papers comparable in scope to the NPC’s efforts in days rather than years.

In reality, the “Hard Truths” report is a piece of political theater carefully constructed to deflect responsibility from the administration for failing to publicly acknowledge and start preparing the nation for the consequences of oil depletion.



To the report’s credit it does discuss peak oil and some of the arguments for an imminent reduction in world production. However, these are quickly dismissed as not giving sufficient weight to economic forces and technological innovation that will soon bring forth sufficient oil and gas, or adequate substitutes, to satisfy the world’s growing demands.



If the administration is lucky, the matter will rest until January 2009 when oil depletion becomes somebody else’s problem. If not, and serious shortages develop in the next 18 months, then “hard truths” may take on a whole new meaning.

Yep, another NPC Report summary. This one better than most.

The notion that the current administration is doing its best to dodge the peak oil issue is, in my opinion, undeniably true. It’s simply another example of their approach to almost everything, from global warming to withdrawing troops from Iraq to doing anything about the massive budget deficits we’ve run since Bush was sworn in.

We desperately need adults in charge, and I urge everyone reading this who will be eligible to vote in the US electins in 2008 to learn about these issues, support the candidate who best reflects your views, and freakin’ vote!!!


From Oil firms find reserves elusive:

This decade’s high crude prices mean there’s plenty of incentive for Daniel O’Byrne, chief operating officer of Calgary-based Provident Energy Trust, to keep finding oil and gas for his company to produce. But he faces a problem - there’s less and less reserves to locate, and the costs of developing them haven’t stopped going up.

“Finding and development costs have had a huge ramp up in the last few years, but the size of the prize is getting smaller,” Mr. O’Byrne said. “Hunting [for reserves] in Western Canada has become much more challenging than it used to be, and it will be a struggle for the whole basin to stay competitive in a global market.”



“The increase is a function of the world’s maturing basins,” said Randy Ollenberger, an analyst at BMO Nesbitt Burns and author of the report. “Companies are still spending capital but they are finding less reserves, while costs for land, equipment, steel and manpower are all increasing.”

And to think that the article never uses the term “peak oil”, when it provides details that so directly support the most basic idea of peak oil, namely that we’ll use up the easy oil first and then have to rely increasingly on far less convenient deposits that can’t be produced at the same rate as the easy oil at anywhere near the same price.


From $100-a-barrel oil may be only a few months away:

The $100-a-barrel oil that Goldman Sachs Group said would prevail by 2009 could be just a few months away.

Jeffrey Currie, a commodity analyst in London for Goldman Sachs, the largest brokerage firm, said that $95 crude was quite likely this year unless OPEC unexpectedly increased production and that declining inventories were raising the chances for oil prices to reach $100.

Jeff Rubin, chief strategist at the brokerage unit of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce in Toronto, said $100 a barrel could come next year.

John Kilduff of the New York office of the futures trading firm Man Financial said, “We’re only a headline of significance away from $100 oil. The unrelenting pressure of increased demand has left the market a coiled spring.”

Again, the words “peak oil” are never uttered. Another example of what Duke Ellington meant when he said you have to find a way to say it without saying it.

And I have to say that I’m insanely jealous of the line, “The unrelenting pressure of increased demand has left the market a coiled spring.” Now that’s a good, and accurate, turn of phrase.

2 Responses to “Bangers and mash”

  1. LochDhu Says:

    Normally I’m not shocked when a conservative think tank says something that indicates their thinking has tanked. However this report:
    http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/cda07-03.cfm
    demonstrates they have been sniffing fumes from a gas tank more than usual.

    In their worst case scenario, Iran sinks a ship in the narrowest part of the Straights of Hormuz and cuts off “6mbd or more” of crude from the Persian Gulf. They conclude that this would cause “the price of WTI crude rise to $150 per barrel by the third quarter of 2007, compared to $65 per barrel if no crisis had occurred.” So, they think that if 7 percent of the worlds oil is suddenly removed from the market oil will ONLY double?! The price has tripled since 2003 mearly because supply hasn’t grown as fast as our demand. Add to that the fear that the conflict could spread to the rest of the region.

    My confidence in reality is reasured when I notice they do not recommend conservation or alternatives to oil. Remember, these are the folks that get to meet secretly with Cheney.

  2. Lou Says:

    You just mentioned one of the Super Secret litmus tests I use when filtering stories–the extent to which the authors discuss conservation. Anyone who thinks we can drill or build our way out of this mess without a major conservation effort is indulging in recreational chemistry.

    I wish at least some of the extremists, from both the Apocalypticon and POD People ends of the spectrum would actually present a detailed analysis of the scenario they see unfolding. Instead we get a lot of hand waving from both the “we’re all going to die, shivering in a cave, in 5 years” and the “problem? what problem?” camps.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisers


blog advertising is good for you


Search

Archives

Other

Site links

Recent posts

Categories

Blogroll