Visit the TCOE discussion board

May 6, 2008

More oil price shadow boxing by at 1:56 PM on May 6, 2008.

Here we go again–yet more they say/we say stuff on the price of oil, although now that oil has surpassed $122/barrel, I suspect we’ll see a matching rise in the volume, frequency, and sometimes the silliness of such conversations.

Oil passes $122 on $200 oil prediction, supply concerns:

Oil futures blasted to a new record over $122 a barrel Tuesday, gaining momentum as investors bought on a forecast of much higher prices and on any news hinting at supply shortages. Retail gas prices edged lower, but appear poised to rise to new records of their own in coming weeks.

A new Goldman Sachs prediction that oil prices could rise to $150 to $200 within two years seemed to motivate much of Tuesday’s buying, although a falling dollar and increasing concerns about declining crude production in Mexico and Russia contributed, analysts say.

Light, sweet crude for June delivery jumped to a new record of $122.47 a barrel before retreating slightly to trade up $1.29 at $122.26 on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Oil prices have nearly doubled from about $62 a barrel a year ago, which Goldman sees as a sign that the world is in the midst of a “super spike” in oil prices. Analyst Arjun Murti said in a research note released Monday that prices would ultimately force demand to fall sharply.

Not everyone shares Goldman’s view. Tim Evans, an analyst at Citigroup Inc., countered Goldman’s analysis with a note predicting that crude prices could as easily fall to $40 a barrel as rise to $200 over the next two years because supplies are, as Evans put it, comfortable.

At the pump, meanwhile, the national average price of a gallon of regular gas slipped 0.1 cent overnight to $3.61, according to AAA and the Oil Price Information Service. Analysts are split over how high gas will go; while prices have slipped lower since May 1, leading some analysts to say gas is close to peaking, others predict the fuel will follow oil’s upward surge.

“You’re going to see new highs for gas prices, probably for the weekend,” said Cordier, who predicts an average price of $4 a gallon in the coming weeks.

In other Nymex trading Tuesday, June gasoline futures rose 5.58 cents to $3.1087 a gallon after earlier setting a new trading record of $3.1163. June heating oil futures rose 5.32 cents to $3.3597 a gallon after rising to their own trading record of $3.3634, and June natural gas futures rose 16 cents to $11.338 per 1,000 cubic feet.

See Goldman’s Murti Says Oil `Likely’ to Reach $150-$200 for more on the latest Goldman prediction, which still apparently holds out hope that this “upcycle” is just a temporary phenomenon.

A few points seemingly in need of being sharpened here, yet again:

Every time I write about oil prices and toss rocks at prognosticators, I get e-mail from readers who want to know what I “really think” oil and gasoline prices will do. I’m sure they find it disappointing, but even in those “private” conversations I don’t resort to a PIDOOMA (pulled it directly out of my a**) and reach for false specifics. I’ll tell you all now what I always tell those closet correspondents: Oil and gasoline prices will generally keep rising for years, no doubt with some dips, whether due to the usual cycles in usage or the combined effects of a slight growth in world oil supply and the rising interest in and practice of conservation.

Could oil hit $200/barrel within two years, even without a kicker from a new war or other above-ground factor? Sure. And it could go a lot higher and even result in outright US gasoline shortages with such an event stirring the pot. That’s not being alarmist, but merely recognizing that all the pieces in orbit around and influencing each other in this witheringly complex worldwide oil market have a pronounced bias towards higher prices for a long, long time to come.

4 Responses to “More oil price shadow boxing”

  1. auntiegrav Says:

    The only thing we know about oil prices is the predictability of those who want to control those prices for profits’ sake. We started a war in Iraq because Saddam was messing around with the price of oil. The unpredictability of the effect was meaningless to the war mongers who thought our technology could smash any country into submission. The failure to account for what happens after there is no longer a country to submit is one for the record books…

    The Saudis kept pumping the volume because they didn’t want high prices to deter consumption in the U.S.. Now that they have an alternate customer in China, they really don’t care what the U.S. will do, if it can do anything at all to reduce consumption at this point without complete collapse. The intertwined petrodollars and petrolifestyles of America are deeply molded around consumer ignorance and emotional wants, propped up by government programs to fuel the flames of self-destruction. Throw in millions of idled contractor pickups and Home Depot employees and let’s see where we go from there on oil prices…

  2. Kiashu Says:

    Well, this is no surprise - Tapis hit $121 about three weeks ago, and where Tapis goes, the other benchmarks follow. The press just focus on the cheapest of the benchmarks because they don’t want to be alarmist, it upsets their advertisers.

    I still say, as I did in my January crystal book gaze, $180 by the end of the year.

    But how would the high oil price cause “outright US gasoline shortages”? Shortages come from declining production, or a consumer panic leading them to fill up every time they see a fuel station, instead of when they’re empty; the current just-in-time inventory system is based on everyone having on average a half-full tank, not a three-quarters full tank.

    I don’t think gasoline/petrol production is going to decline significantly this year unless someone blows up a refinery. So that leaves consumer panic. You expect people to panic if it jumps fifty cents overnight, or something?

  3. Samantha Says:

    If we really want to rid ourselves of the instability and volatility high oil prices bring, we need a comprehensive plan to promote energy efficiency (in the short term) and renewable energy (in the long term). The renewables industry is making huge gains even without the amount of subsidies oil and gas industries receive. If we could devote the same kind of focus to promoting and investing in renewable energy, the prospect of a $200 barrel of oil would not be quite as frightening.

    If you’re interested in learning more about the renewable energy industry, you should check out the Renewable Energy Finance Forum (REFF), held June 18-19 in New York City. REFF provides financiers, investors, and renewable energy project developers with an opportunity to network and share ideas about the future of the industry. Speakers will include over 40 high profile industry leaders, discussing topics such as solar power, wind energy, biofuels, and world energy trends.

    For more information, visit www.REFFWallStreet.com.

  4. Lou Says:

    Samantha: Thanks for posting that, and I could not possibly agree more with your comments about renewable energy (as I suspect you’ve noticed if you’ve read almost anything I’ve said here).

    The cynic (read: economist) in me says that we won’t see a wholesale push for renewables until they’re not just as cheap as fossil fuels, but cheaper by enough to overcome the inertia that works against that level of change. We will do the right thing, only when we’ve exhausted all other, cheaper, alternatives. I just hope we reach that point in time to spare ourselves and the environment a lot of needless suffering.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisers


blog advertising is good for you


Search

Archives

Other

Site links

Recent posts

Categories

Blogroll